Skip to main content

Compatibility study of patiromer with juices/liquids and soft foods

Abstract

Patiromer powder for oral suspension (patiromer o.s.) is a once-daily, potassium (K+) binder approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia. It is known that patiromer o.s. can be mixed with water, apple juice, or cranberry juice. This in vitro study assessed whether mixing patiromer o.s. with a variety of other liquids and soft foods would affect the total K+-exchange capacity (TKEC) of patiromer. Juices (grape, orange, pear, or pineapple), nectars (apricot or peach), and other liquids/soft foods (milk, thickener, apple sauce, chocolate pudding, vanilla pudding, or yoghurt) were assessed for compatibility with patiromer o.s. at low and high ratio levels, equivalent to patiromer active moiety doses of 8.4 g and 25.2 g per 80 mL (1/3 cup), respectively. Mixtures were stirred, rested for 45 min, diluted with water, and centrifuged. Residues were washed, vacuum filtered, and dried. TKEC of the residue was evaluated; the prespecified acceptance criterion for patiromer was 8.4–10.0 mmol/g. Mean TKECs of the patiromer in juices/nectars were 8.7–8.9 mmol/g for the low ratio and 8.5–8.6 mmol/g for the high ratio. For other liquids/soft foods, the mean TKEC for patiromer at low and high ratios was 8.5–8.7 mmol/g. All tested vehicles were within the prespecified range. Mixing of patiromer o.s. with juices/liquids and soft foods does not adversely affect the K+-binding capability of patiromer. Use of different vehicles for suspending patiromer o.s. may help with its palatability, enhance patient experience, and reduce nonadherence.

Graphical Abstract

The potassium binder, patiromer powder for oral suspension, can be mixed with water, juices (apple, cranberry, grape, orange, pear, or pineapple), nectar (apricot or peach), other liquids (milk or thickener), and soft foods (apple sauce, chocolate or vanilla pudding, or yoghurt) for the treatment of hyperkalemia.

Introduction

Patiromer powder for oral suspension (patiromer o.s.) is a once-daily non-absorbed polymer of patiromer sorbitex calcium spherical beads that acts as a potassium (K+) binder in the gastrointestinal tract before being removed in the feces (Li et al. 2016). Patiromer o.s. is approved for treatment of hyperkalemia in adults (Vifor Pharma 2021, Vifor Pharma 2022). Patiromer o.s. is tasteless and odorless and was initially approved for oral administration suspended in 80 mL (1/3 cup) of water (Vifor Pharma 2021, Vifor Pharma 2022). As it was previously shown that there was no adverse impact on in vitro total K+-exchange capacity (TKEC) when patiromer o.s. was mixed with apple juice or cranberry juice (Fogli et al. 2018), both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of apple or cranberry juice as alternative suspension vehicles (Vifor Pharma 2021, Vifor Pharma 2022). Since patients may prefer to take patiromer o.s. with alternative liquids or soft foods, the ability to mix it with small amounts of various liquids or soft foods may improve palatability and medication adherence. This in vitro study assessed the compatibility of patiromer o.s. with six different juices and nectars (grape juice, orange juice, pear juice, pineapple juice, apricot nectar, or peach nectar) and six other liquids/soft foods (milk, thickener, apple sauce, chocolate pudding, vanilla pudding, or yoghurt).

Materials and methods

Materials

Patiromer o.s., lot CGFYW, was used for all tests. Juices (grape, orange, pear, or pineapple), milk, apple sauce, and yoghurt were obtained from Migros or Coop in Switzerland. Nectars (apricot and peach), Thick-It thickener and Jell-O puddings (chocolate and vanilla) were obtained from online distributors Brack and Desertcart.

Sample preparation

The compatibility of patiromer with liquids and soft foods was assessed at two ratios, in line with the currently approved dosing of patiromer (Vifor Pharma 2021, Vifor Pharma 2022). Approximately half the weight of patiromer o.s. (excluding the suspending agent, which makes up 0.7% of the weight) is from the patiromer active moiety; therefore, for the low-level ratio, 8.5-g patiromer o.s. was mixed with 40 mL of vehicle (~ 1/6 cup), which is equivalent to a patiromer active moiety dose of 8.4 g per 80 mL (1/3 cup) of vehicle. For the high-level ratio, 12.7-g patiromer o.s. was mixed with 20 mL of vehicle (~ 1/12 cup), which is equivalent to a patiromer active moiety dose of 25.2 g per 80 mL (1/3 cup) of vehicle. Samples were prepared in triplicate.

For juices and nectars, the suspension was stirred for 5 min at medium speed with a magnetic stirrer; for other liquids and soft foods, the suspension was stirred with a spoon for 30 s (Fig. 1). Juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods were rested for 45 min. For juices and nectars, the suspension was diluted to 50 mL in purified water (water R); for other liquids and soft foods, the suspension was diluted to 100-mL purified water. Suspensions were shaken before centrifugation at 117 g for 30 s (centrifuge 5430R, Eppendorf). The supernatant was then transferred into a separate plastic vial. The remaining residue was washed six times with 50-mL purified water and vacuum filtered. TKEC, K+-binding capacity (KBC), and microscopic appearance were determined from the residue. Fluoride concentration was determined in the supernatant to assess patiromer’s stability.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patiromer o.s. preparation and assessment. KBC Potassium-binding capacity, Patiromer o.s. Patiromer powder for oral suspension, TKEC Total potassium-exchange capacity

Total potassium-exchange capacity

Approximately 3 g of prepared sample residue was weighed into a 50-mL centrifugation vial, 40 mL of 1N hydrochloric acid (HCl) was added, and the suspension was incubated for 20 min under shaking. The suspension was centrifuged for 1 min at 470 g (centrifuge 5430R, Eppendorf), and the supernatant was removed. This was repeated once more with 40 mL of 1N HCl. The remaining solid residue was washed a minimum of five times with 40 mL of purified water until the pH of the supernatant was neutral. The solid residue was filtered and dried at 130 °C for 2 h, and 50 mg of dried sample was weighed into a plastic vial; 25 mL of K-start solution (prepared by diluting 50 mL of 1N potassium hydroxide [KOH; Merck] to 1000 mL with purified water to give a 50 mmol/L solution) was added, and the suspension was incubated for 2 h under shaking. The suspension was filtered, diluted, and analyzed by ion chromatography with conductivity detection (ICS-3000, Dionex). The chromatographic separation was achieved on a CS12A column (250 × 4 mm, Dionex) with guard column CG12A (50 × 4 mm, Dionex). The eluent was 20-mM methanesulfonic acid at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The oven temperature was set at 35 °C. Under these conditions, potassium elutes at approximately 5 min. The suppressor (CSRS300, Dionex) was regenerated with water R.

The K+ concentration in mM for the K-start and sample solutions was determined by linear regression. The TKEC was determined from the difference of these solutions, referring to the weighed sample amount. The prespecified acceptance criterion was 8.4–10.0 mmol/g based on the commercial limits for TKEC (Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration 2019).

Potassium-binding capacity

Approximately 450 mg of prepared sample residue was weighed into a 20-mL centrifugation vial, 10 mL of K-start solution (200 mmol/L) was added, and the suspension was incubated for 2 h under shaking. As per the TKEC method described in full above, the suspension was filtered, diluted, and analyzed by ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection (ICS-3000, Dionex).

The K+ concentration in mM for the K-start and sample solutions was determined by linear regression. The KBC was determined from the difference in K+ concentration of these solutions, referring to the weighed sample amount. The prespecified acceptance criterion was 1.7–2.5 mmol/g based on internal limits for KBC.

To understand the binding of K+ from orange juice to patiromer, K+ concentration was assessed in triplicate samples of untreated juice and supernatant from orange juice incubated with patiromer o.s. at low- and high-level ratios. The bound K+ fraction was determined from the difference in K+ concentration of samples of the supernatant and the untreated juice.

Fluoride

The chemical structure of patiromer contains fluorine (Li et al. 2016) and fluoride can be generated as a degradation product (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 2015). The fluoride limit during the shelf-life of patiromer o.s. is in line with European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendations for people ≥ 15 years old (patiromer o.s. is not indicated for children < 18 years old) (European Medicines Agency 2017, European Food Safety Authority 2005).

To assess patiromer’s stability once mixed with vehicles, the fluoride concentration of the supernatant from prepared samples was determined. The pH of the supernatant from prepared samples was adjusted to be within pH 3–7. Four calibration standards in the range 0.1–10 mg fluoride/L were prepared from a 1000 mg/L fluoride solution (Merck). Potentials of sample and standard solutions were measured after addition of 5.0 mL of total ionic strength adjustment buffer II (Thermo Scientific) and thorough mixing with an ion-selective electrode (Orion™ Fluoride Electrode, Thermo Scientific).

The concentration of fluoride was determined from a fluoride calibration curve by preparing a semilogarithmic plot of concentration on the x-axis and potential on the y-axis. The prespecified acceptance limit was not more than 135 parts per million (ppm) based on the commercial limits for fluoride (the EFSA recommends the tolerable upper intake level for fluoride is 7 mg/day in people ≥ 15 years old (European Food Safety Authority 2005)).

Appearance and microscopy

Appearance of patiromer o.s. mixed with juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods was assessed visually using Pantone cards. Microscopic images of prepared sample residues were obtained after incubation of patiromer o.s. with vehicles at low and high ratios using an Axio Microscope (Zeiss, Germany).

Results

Mean TKEC for patiromer o.s. mixed with juices and nectars was 8.7–8.9 mmol/g for the low ratio and 8.5–8.6 mmol/g for the high ratio (Table 1). Mean TKEC for patiromer o.s. mixed with other liquids and soft foods was 8.5–8.7 mmol/g for both the low and high ratio (Table 1). Mean TKEC for the juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods was, therefore, within the prespecified acceptance criterion of 8.4–10.0 mmol/g. Mean KBC results were consistent with TKEC and were within the prespecified acceptance criterion of 1.7–2.5 mmol/g.

Table 1 Mean TKEC for patiromer o.s. mixed with juices/nectars and other liquids/soft foods

Binding of K+ from orange juice to patiromer at low and high ratios was assessed when patiromer o.s. was mixed with orange juice. At low and high patiromer ratios, respectively, 70% and 84% of the K+ in the orange juice was bound to patiromer, and only 10% and 5% of the relative KBC of patiromer had been used (Table 2).

Table 2 Binding of K+ from orange juice to patiromer o.s

The lot of patiromer o.s. used for these tests was light orange. For the samples of patiromer o.s. exposed to milk, chocolate pudding, and vanilla pudding, no visible changes of light orange were detected. Exposure of patiromer o.s. to orange juice, pear juice, pineapple juice, apricot nectar, peach nectar, thickener, apple sauce, or yoghurt resulted in a color change to light yellow, and light violet was detectable after exposure of patiromer o.s. to grape juice. Patiromer o.s. prepared in peach nectar or apple sauce are shown in Fig. 1 and in grape juice or milk are shown in Fig. 2. No visible alteration of patiromer o.s. spherical beads in juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods was detected by microscopy (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Appearance of patiromer o.s. in vehicles, b microscopy of untreated patiromer o.s., and c microscopy of patiromer o.s. at low and high ratios in grape juice and milk. The low and high ratios are equivalent to patiromer active moiety doses of 8.4 g and 25.2 g per 80 mL (1/3 cup) of vehicle, respectively. Patiromer o.s. Patiromer powder for oral suspension

The amount of fluoride released into supernatants was determined to assess patiromer’s stability. Mean fluoride concentration in juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods was 5.5–22.8 ppm (Table 3). The fluoride concentrations are below the prespecified acceptance limit of not more than 135 ppm.

Table 3 Mean amount of fluoride released from patiromer o.s. mixed with juices/nectars and other liquids/soft foods

Discussion

It was previously shown that there was no adverse impact on in vitro TKEC when patiromer o.s. was mixed with apple juice or cranberry juice (Fogli et al. 2018). The current study showed that mixing of patiromer o.s. with an additional number of juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods does not adversely affect the patiromer’s TKEC, KBC, appearance, or stability. On the basis of the findings of this study, both the EMA and FDA have approved the expanded use of liquids or soft foods (e.g., grape juice, orange juice, pear juice, pineapple juice, apricot nectar, peach nectar, milk, thickener, apple sauce, chocolate pudding, vanilla pudding, or yoghurt) in addition to apple juice and cranberry juice as alternative suspension vehicles (Vifor Pharma 2021, Vifor Pharma 2022).

The recommended dietary K+ intake is 4.7 g/day for the general population, individuals with normal kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), no proteinuria but at risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD, e.g. diabetes), and individuals with mild-moderate CKD (eGFR 30 to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) with proteinuria < 0.3 g/day (if no frequent/severe hyperkalemia) (Cupisti et al. 2018). For individuals with advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or any CKD with proteinuria > 0.3 g/day (if hyperkalemia with high-fiber intake), and individuals on prevalent dialysis therapy or any CKD stage with existing or imminent protein-energy wasting (with high-fiber intake), the recommended dietary K+ intake is < 3 g/day (Cupisti et al. 2018). The K+ content of liquids or soft foods used to prepare the mixture should be considered as part of the dietary recommendations on K+ intake for each individual patient (Table 4) (Vifor Pharma 2021, Vifor Pharma 2022).

Table 4 Typical K+ content of juices/nectars and other liquids/soft foods (University of Michigan Health 2016; Eat this much 2022; Kent Precision Foods Group 2022; HEB 2022)

Orange juice has the highest concentration of K+ of the juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods evaluated, with 159 mg of K+ per 80 mL of orange juice (University of Michigan Health 2016). We observed that a large proportion of the K+ in the orange juice was bound to patiromer (70–84% depending on the ratio level), and the relative KBC of patiromer was only reduced by a small amount (5–10% depending on the ratio level); this suggested that the K+ in the orange juice would have a limited impact on the efficacy of patiromer and, furthermore, could potentially attenuate the intestinal absorption of K+ from the orange juice.

The results also show that the vehicles evaluated did not impact the stability of patiromer since fluoride concentrations with all vehicles remained below the prespecified acceptance limit. Mean fluoride concentrations in juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods were 5.5–22.8 ppm, which is less than 40 ppm stated on patiromer’s certificate of analysis that was previously determined in 0.25 N HCl for 2 h. However, juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods are expected to be less acidic (in the range of pH 3–7) than 0.25 N HCl after a 45-min exposure to the vehicle, which will have impacted the results.

A key limitation of this study is that it was conducted in vitro; however, in a previous clinical study evaluating the effect of food on patiromer’s ability to lower serum potassium in patients with hyperkalemia, patiromer was found to be equally effective at potassium lowering when taken with food or without food (Pergola et al. 2017). Considered together with the data from the current study, the juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods tested are not expected to impact patiromer’s potassium-lowering effect in vivo. Additionally, since this was an in vitro study, palatability was not assessed. However, palatability of patiromer in water has previously been studied, with 90% of healthy volunteers reporting positive palatability experiences with patiromer in terms of odor or taste (Brenner et al. 2016). The choice of different vehicles to take patiromer o.s. may help with its palatability and enhance patient experience.

Conclusion

Mixing of patiromer o.s. with small amounts of juices, nectars, other liquids, and soft foods does not adversely affect the drug’s capacity to bind to K+ or its stability. Use of different vehicles to take patiromer o.s. may help with its palatability, enhance patient experience, and reduce the risk of nonadherence.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

EFSA:

European Food Safety Authority

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

EMA:

European Medicines Agency

FDA:

US Food and Drug Administration

HCl:

Hydrochloric acid

K+ :

Potassium

KBC:

K+-binding capacity

KOH:

Potassium hydroxide

Patiromer o.s.:

Patiromer powder for oral suspension

ppm:

Parts per million

RSD:

Relative standard deviation

TKEC:

Total K+-exchange capacity

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Katja Bösch for technical assistance including carrying out material preparation, data collection, and analysis. Editorial support was provided by Sandra Boswell PhD at AXON Communications Inc. (London, UK) and was funded by Vifor Pharma Management Ltd. This study was previously presented as an abstract and poster at the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Kidney Week 2021, November 2–7, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

Funding was provided by Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ltd., who were involved in the design of the study; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study concept and design. MK organized the study, supervised the laboratory experiments, checked and interpreted the results, and provided the first draft of the manuscript. MW interpreted the results and reviewed and adapted the first draft of the manuscript. CPMQ and LL reviewed and provided feedback on the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on subsequent drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Khoeiklang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M. K., M. W., L. L., and C. P. M. Q. are employees of CSL Vifor.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoeiklang, M., Wilhelm, M., Li, L. et al. Compatibility study of patiromer with juices/liquids and soft foods. AAPS Open 9, 14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41120-023-00081-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41120-023-00081-w

Keywords